MAP Strategic Wealth Advisors

Five takeaways:

About a year ago, Sweden’s education system intentionally decreased its reliance on technology in the classroom– prioritizing paper/pencils over use of computers, for instance. The outcome has been positive, showing that less reliance on technology-based learning yields greater academic success & overall understanding of information. Neuroscientists have dug into why, and presented these five findings:

1. Learning requires empathy: Learning is interpersonal. The understanding of new information is reliant a social connection we build with whomever is giving that information. This accounts for why 85% of tuition-free students and 50% fee-paying students never complete online programs.
2. Creativity demands personally coded knowledge: Technology, including AI, effectively erases the need for humans to memorize large quantities of information. But it is often our practiced understanding of learned information that allows us to use it, build upon it, or employ it creatively. Technology gives us access to knowledge, but hinders our ability to retain it– or put it to creative use.
3. Learning requires undivided attention: Given that technology is used for both academic and recreational purposes, humans become inclined to multitask between the two. Multitasking worsens performance as the functions necessary to perform multiple tasks often blend together. It also redirects our information of how to perform tasks to our subconscious memories, making them more inaccessible in the long term.
4. Location plays a key role in memory: On a neurological level, printed information is easier to recall than digitized information because print ensures that the information stays in an unchanging location, whereas digitized information can change location and form across screens.
5. Use Flashcards: committing facts to memory is the foundation for higher-level thinking. Flashcards are one of the most effective ways to get information to sink in, because they stimulate recall. Information written on flashcards help construct memory and become more easy to access in the long term.

From Jared Cooney Horvath, PhD for Psychology Today
Read the whole story.

Note: At the time of this posting The Atlantic offers five free article views per month.

Takeaways:

We are in a “National happiness funk.” Why? Brooks believes that it has to do with our self-control, citing studies that show low self-control is directly correlated with lower well-being.

Brooks argues that culture today encourages us to relax our sense of self-control to get happier, leading to an unfortunate result that makes us unhappier as individuals, and therefore as a country.

Brooks notes three common influences pushing us to suspend self-control: excess alcohol consumption, anonymity online (which can encourage antisocial and corrosive behavior), and the addictive ability of social media to make one feel more powerful/important than they are.

The notion that self-control creates happiness is not new. Benjamin Franklin said, “Educate your children to self-control, to the habit of holding passion and prejudice and evil tendencies subject to an upright and reasoning will, and you have done much to abolish misery from their future and crimes from society.”

While the suppression of immediate desires may seem contrived or inauthentic, greater self control should actually be viewed as the most authentic thing you can do– and in fact, creates an authentically better version of ourselves.

From Arthur C. Brooks at The Atlantic:
Read the whole story.

Note: At the time of this posting The Atlantic offers five free article views per month.

Four takeaways:

It is natural to react negatively to criticism, especially when it feels like “destructive” feedback rather than “constructive” commentary clearly meant to help you. But to allow your emotional response to criticism to overshadow the opportunity for improvement it offers is both unproductive and detrimental.

The only way to flourish amid negative criticism, and despite it, is to adopt new habits of both getting and giving it. Here are some research backed tactics for doing just that:

1. It’s not personal (even when it’s personal): When criticized, we often jump to consider it a judgment on our inherent abilities, rather than on our performance. Remember to assess criticism at face value, looking at it as separate from a direct statement on your worth. “Depersonalize” it. View feedback objectively and analytically, focusing on the content rather than taking it as a personal attack.
2. Treat criticism like insider information: By depersonalizing criticism, you can see it as a valuable insight into how others view your performance and an opportunity to improve. This turns the opinion of others into key learnings. When you empower others to criticize your performance, it becomes less painful when they do, leading to rapid improvement and a reduced fear of critics.
3. Make criticism a gift, never a weapon: This is a reminder about giving criticism well. In criticizing another, remember the gift/weapon rule: “If I am criticizing to help, I am doing it right; if I am doing it to harm, I am doing it wrong.” Criticize with the care of the recipient in mind; be respectful in delivery; be conscious of your own good intentions; provide a pathway to improvement; and targeting of the recipient’s needs appropriately.
4. “Praise in public, criticize in private”: This is a quote from legendary coach Vince Lombardi, whose instincts were correct: A 2014 study found that publicly given positive feedback was 9% more motivating for students, whereas privately given negative feedback was 11% more motivating than when given publicly.

With these practical tips on board, we hope you can embrace the power of both giving and receiving negative feedback. A healthy relationship to criticism will foster improvement and, over time, enhance your wellbeing.

From Arthur C. Brooks at The Atlantic:
Read the whole story.

Note: At the time of this posting The Atlantic offers five free article views per month.